|
|
|
"...Freakonomics meets ESPN." —Alan
Schwarz, author, The Numbers Game
Taking Measure of the Many Myths
in Modern Sport
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Reviews | What's Inside | Where to Order | Stanford University Press |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Chapter
Excerpts
|
|
Chapter Five: The NBA’s Competitive Balance Problem? from Blue Ribbon Analysis
for the NBA, pp. 64-66 The
NBA currently consists of 30 franchises. Of these, sixteen have never won a title.
If one looks at the past 50 years, one wonders how the NBA has survived. In
this time, the Boston Celtics have won the title sixteen times. The Los
Angeles Lakers have been champions nine times. The Chicago Bulls have six
championships. A bit of math reveals that three franchises have won 31
titles, or 62% of the championships played over five decades. If we throw in
the Detroit Pistons and the San Antonio Spurs—three titles for each
franchise—five cities have hosted the NBA champion nearly three-quarters of
the time. The
disparity in titles has not improved in recent years. In the past twenty
years, only six teams have won the title. Perhaps the good news is that
Boston, who has won the most titles in NBA history, has only won once in the
last two decades. The other nineteen championships, though, have been
captured by five franchises: Chicago Bulls (six titles), Los Angeles Lakers
(five titles), Detroit Pistons (three titles), San Antonio Spurs (three
titles), and Houston Rockets (two titles). All five franchises won multiple
titles across this time frame. Furthermore, on nine different occasions
across the past twenty years the NBA champion was a repeat offender. In other
words, nearly half the time, if you bet that the past champion would repeat, you
would win the bet. So we have a league where the majority of teams have never
won a title, and the team that won last year seems to have a decent chance of
winning this year. Given such inequity in the distribution of titles, the
fans of many NBA teams probably suspect that their team is not likely to win
an NBA championship any time soon. If
we look at other sports, championships are distributed a bit more equally. If
we look at the past twenty years, spanning the 1985 to 2004 seasons, ten
different franchises have taken the Stanley Cup in hockey. Football does a
bit better, with eleven teams winning the Super Bowl in the NFL over this
time frame. In baseball, the sport that supposedly suffers from a competitive
balance problem, fourteen different teams won a World Series from 1984 to
2004. Of these fourteen, only four won multiple titles: the New York Yankees,
Florida Marlins, Toronto Blue Jays, and the Minnesota Twins. Of
course, as we noted, playoff results, or the Blue Ribbon approach, will not
tell us much about competitive balance. Let’s look at the recent history of
the Noll-Scully measure. In Table 5.1 we present twenty years of the
Noll-Scully in each of the major North American sports leagues. On average,
with the glaring exception of the NBA, each league has an actual standard
deviation that is less than two times the ideal measure. Remember from the
last chapter, the average Noll-Scully across all leagues we examined was
1.86. So every North American league not playing with an orange ball bested
the average. TABLE 5.1 Twenty Years of Competitive
Balance in North America
The
NBA, though, has an actual standard deviation that is nearly three times the ideal.
From these measures we would have to conclude that the NBA is in serious
trouble. Baseball, the sport that is supposed to have a problem, looks like a
socialist paradise compared to the NBA. So if anyone still believes baseball
has a competitive balance crisis, when these people look at the NBA they must
expect professional basketball in North America to be in its final days. If
we go back to what we said in Chapter Two, though, we can see this is not the
case. For the 1985–86 season the average NBA team
attracted 487,604 fans, at that point an all-time attendance record for the
league. The NBA has set nine additional attendance records since then, the
most recent in 2004–05 when the average team attracted 710,095 people. From
1986 to 2005, when only six teams were able to win NBA titles, per-team
attendance rose 46%.We should note that a similar story could be told in
baseball. During the Blue Ribbon years (1995–99) when baseball was supposed
to be dying at the hand of the dreaded Yankees, per game attendance in Major
League Baseball rose 15%. For
those who have invested time in the study of competitive balance, this result
is troubling. The NBA, relative to any other league we have examined, is not
competitively balanced. Yet fans keep coming to the games. What is attracting
the fans in the NBA? Our answer to this question was offered in two articles,
entitled “Stars at the Gate” (Berri, Schmidt, and
Brook, 2004) and “On the Road with the NBA’s Superstar Externality” (Berri and Schmidt, forthcoming in 2006). Again we suspect
many people have not taken the time to read these articles. So in this
chapter we review and extend the story we have told. Excerpts (c) 2006 by the Board of Trustees of the Leland
Stanford Jr. University. No further use,
reproduction or distribution of this material is allowed without the written
permission of the publisher. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|